|
本帖最后由 kafuuchino 于 2020-7-22 21:14 编辑
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
- Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.6
- Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash
- Fixed bugs version usage : wget -qO- https://git.io/Jvh0J | bash
- Fixed version 3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz
- CPU Cores : 2 Cores 3599.998 MHz x86_64
- CPU Cache : 8192 KB
- OS : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (64 Bit) KVM
- Kernel : 4.14.168-bbrplus
- Total Space : 1.2 GB / 25.0 GB
- Total RAM : 53 MB / 1997 MB (241 MB Buff)
- Total SWAP : 0 MB / 0 MB
- Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 1 min
- Load Average : 0.15, 0.03, 0.01
- TCP CC : bbrplus
- ASN & ISP : AS24940, Hetzner Online GmbH
- Organization : Hetzner
- Location : Frankfurt am Main, Germany / DE
- Region : Hesse
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 896 MB/s
- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 955 MB/s
- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 958 MB/s
- Average I/O Speed : 936.3 MB/s
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
- Speedtest.net 630.29 Mbit/s 324.90 Mbit/s 13.807 ms
- Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 130.5 Mbit/s -
- Nanjing 5G CT 1.42 Mbit/s 2.09 Mbit/s -
- Hefei 5G CT 5.71 Mbit/s 30.43 Mbit/s -
- Guangzhou 5G CT 0.72 Mbit/s 1.41 Mbit/s -
- TianJin 5G CU 18.77 Mbit/s 14.13 Mbit/s -
- Shanghai 5G CU 26.19 Mbit/s 69.54 Mbit/s -
- Guangzhou 5G CU 22.07 Mbit/s 62.63 Mbit/s -
- Tianjin 5G CM 6.81 Mbit/s 31.12 Mbit/s -
- Wuxi 5G CM 3.53 Mbit/s 8.49 Mbit/s -
- Nanjing 5G CM 1.51 Mbit/s 34.17 Mbit/s -
- Hefei 5G CM 2.23 Mbit/s 26.60 Mbit/s -
- Changsha 5G CM 16.46 Mbit/s 57.99 Mbit/s -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Finished in : 6 min 15 sec
- Timestamp : 2020-07-22 19:00:46 GMT+8
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Share result:
- · http://www.speedtest.net/result/9795479831.png
复制代码
原先的io只有200mb/s,和其他的mjj相差甚远,于是发工单询问,今天得到回复,能够更换节点。
这个就是更换后的数据,io我很满意,终于和其他mjj一样了。但是cpu版本从之前的v6降为了v5,这我又有点失衡了,真就鱼和熊掌不可兼得,问下v6和v5实际差别大不
再上一个跑分,感觉v5和v6差别不是很大,分数和其他mjj差不多
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 22 2020 08:12:02 - 08:39:56
- 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43345790.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Double-Precision Whetstone 6905.4 MWIPS (9.0 s, 7 samples)
- Execl Throughput 3897.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 612896.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 160868.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1866526.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Pipe Throughput 800943.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Pipe-based Context Switching 101447.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Process Creation 7753.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10368.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1764.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- System Call Overhead 436780.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43345790.0 3714.3
- Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6905.4 1255.5
- Execl Throughput 43.0 3897.4 906.4
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 612896.2 1547.7
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 160868.6 972.0
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1866526.2 3218.1
- Pipe Throughput 12440.0 800943.8 643.8
- Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 101447.4 253.6
- Process Creation 126.0 7753.2 615.3
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10368.6 2445.4
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1764.8 2941.4
- System Call Overhead 15000.0 436780.6 291.2
- ========
- System Benchmarks Index Score 1129.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 22 2020 08:39:56 - 09:07:52
- 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 82355479.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Double-Precision Whetstone 13453.1 MWIPS (8.8 s, 7 samples)
- Execl Throughput 7374.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1075624.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 275027.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3289915.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Pipe Throughput 1538121.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Pipe-based Context Switching 418841.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Process Creation 14883.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12463.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2012.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- System Call Overhead 812256.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 82355479.7 7057.0
- Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13453.1 2446.0
- Execl Throughput 43.0 7374.8 1715.1
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1075624.5 2716.2
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 275027.2 1661.8
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3289915.0 5672.3
- Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1538121.9 1236.4
- Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 418841.4 1047.1
- Process Creation 126.0 14883.2 1181.2
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12463.1 2939.4
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2012.4 3354.1
- System Call Overhead 15000.0 812256.0 541.5
- ========
- System Benchmarks Index Score 2070.0
- ======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
复制代码 |
|